Accounting

Outline of “small gaap” visible in the distance and it is not a mirage

The general shape of the Financial Reporting Framework for Small-and Medium-sized Entities appears in a FAQ from the AICPA: AICPA’s Other Comprehensive Basis of Accounting (“OCBOA”) Project – 2012.

The Financial Reporting Framework will be referred to as FRF. The AICPA describes it as

Should churches disclose open tax years? Probably not.

I previously discussed that NPOs should disclose open tax years – TIS 5250.15.

TIS 5250.15 says that NPOs without any uncertain tax positions still have to disclose open tax years.

ASC 740-10-55-217 suggests this wording:

The Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various states and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-US income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 20×1.

Does that apply to churches?

Two new financial reporting frameworks. FAF makes a decision on private company accounting rules. AICPA starts work on new accounting rules for private companies.

FAF has approved a new organization that will determine what rules in GAAP don’t need to be applied to private companies.

The lead paragraph from Accounting Today:

The Financial Accounting Foundation’s board of trustees has voted to establish a new Private Company Council that will determine whether exceptions or modifications to U.S. GAAP for privately held companies are necessary.

Range of U.S., Chinese, and Japanese regulators’ responses to fraud in today’s news – Olympus and Longtop

Sometimes you get fun results when you look at two news articles side by side. Let’s look at the responses of securities regulators in the US, China, and Japan.  Hat tip to Going Concern for highlighting the articles.

Olympus fine

Japan’s securities market regulator proposed a fine of $2.5M against Olympus for conducting a $1.7 billion financial fraud that was spread over 13 years – Japan market watchdog recommends $2.5 million fine for Olympus.

Let’s put that proposed fine into perspective. All amounts will be in US dollars.

10 invalid arguments in favor of IFRS

Professor Tom Selling provides presents 10 arguments provided by others who are in favor of IFRS and then explains why those arguments are incorrect.  Actually, he uses the word false.

He provides some background on how we got to this place and starts the discussion at 10 Claims in Support of IFRS Adoption by the SEC – and Why They are False (Part One of Three).

He continues the discussion in part two and part three.

His discussion is quite lengthy, so get a large, fresh cup of coffee or an extra-large soda and settle in for a long read. Even this recap will run quite long.

Here is his list with my extremely short paraphrase that won’t come close to doing justice. …

Arguments against IFRS adoption – 10 problems with claims in favor

Just a quick note for the large number of people landing on my blog today after searching for arguments against IFRS adoption – Be sure to visit Dr. Tom Sellings’ blog, The Accounting Onion

Three great posts that I plan to comment on later, but you might find valuable today. They were posted this week, so they  may not yet be sorting high on the search engines. Check out all three parts.

 Ten Claims in Support of IFRS Adoption by the SEC – and Why They are False

You will also want to visit Dr. David Albrecht’s blog, The Summa.

Some of my other posts are here, here, here, and here. Or use the search button on top right corner.

 

Panel clears E&Y over Olympus auditing – far less to the report than meets the eye

The Wall Street Journal headline says Panel Clears Ernst & Young in Olympus Probe.

Cool update on the investigation, huh? An official panel looks at E&Y’s role and concludes their auditing was okay.  They have no legal liability.

I was quite interested in the article.  Then found out the details.

Primer for CPAs on testing the functional allocation

I discuss the e-book Lies, White Lies, and Accounting Practices; Why nonprofit overhead doesn’t mean what you think it means by Saundra Schimmelpfennig at my other blog, Nonprofit Update.

If you are a CPA working with NPOs, check out my description of the book in my post, Q: Are overhead ratios the perfect measure of NPO efficiency and effectiveness?   You ought to get the book.

I suggest you buy a copy of the book for all of your staff who work with NPOs. Would be a cheap and fast way to provide some education on testing the functional allocation.

Remember to book construction retainages

On construction projects, there’s typically a retention held back from the contractor until the project is complete.  Scott Moglia at Nonprofit GPS has a reminder in Don’ Forget about your Retainages:

Remember to pick up the liability for retainage on construction projects.

When I read his post, I pondered a moment and realized that if all of my clients were  a baseball team, the lifetime team batting average for booking that liability when it exists is about 0.000.

Remember to look for, and record, retainages.

Read the full, short article.