Jim Ulvog

Option to explain reasons for lack of independence in SSARS 19 compilation

An option to disclose the reasons for a lack of independence when performing a compilation has been introduced by SSARS 19.  Now the accountant can explain in the report why independence is impaired.  Previously, the accountant could not provide any explanation for lack of independence.

Here are some examples along with a rather important condition.

SSARS 19 – Sample compilation report for omitting the statement of cash flow

Omission of cash flow statement– Compilation reports will change for organizations with fiscal years ending after December 15, 2010. Here is the modified report I will be using after the first of the year for my non-profit clients if any would choose to omit the statement of cash flow. I doubt that will happen in my client base, but wanted to make this example available to the CPA community.

Update – SSARS 19 had been replaced by SSARS 21. All the reports have been revised. See:

 

SSARS 19 – Sample compilation report for omitting substantially all disclosures

Omission of substantially all disclosures — Compilation reports will change for organizations with fiscal years ending after December 15, 2010. I have prepared a modified report for departure from GAAP.  Here is the report I will be using after the first of the year for my non-profit clients if any choose to omit all disclosures.  Please feel free to copy, but make sure you modify this based on your firm’s policies.

Update – SSARS 19 had been replaced by SSARS 21. All the reports have been revised. See:

 

Time to start paying attention to Ernst and the collapse of Lehman

The New York AG has sued Ernst & Young over its role in the collapse of Lehman Brothers.  Probably a good time for those of us CPAs who are far removed from the Big 4 world to start paying attention.  The article in the Wall Street Journal here is a good place to start.  The articles I’ve read at the WSJ and elsewhere are starting to have those “where were the auditors” type of questions.  I know you don’t have enough things to do, but might be worth reading a few articles on point.

What in the world are presumptively mandatory and unconditional requirements? And why does SSARS 19 talk about should and must?

What in the world are unconditional requirements and presumptively mandatory requirements?

If you provide audits to your clients, you know those terms.  If you don’t deal with audits in your firm, these are two very weird terms in the SSARSs world, newly introduced by SSARS 19These phrases have been around since SSARS 16, which was effective December 2007.  The impact hadn’t been that large because there was only SSARS 17 and 18.  These two phrases are lots more important since they show up in SSARS 19 quite frequently.