Where is the fence?
When an auditor finds several problems in one small area of the accounting, a typical approach is to put a fence around it. That means, figure what the outer boundaries are. Is it just one month’s worth of transactions in one department of one branch? If a little testing at the boundaries indicates the problem is localized, you can start working on the problem.
On the other hand, if the problem carries across to the whole year, or it affects many other branches, there is bigger problem. If you realize several other departments have the same issue, then you have no idea how big the problem is.
The worst situation is when every time you think there is a fence around the problem, the problem jumps the fence. An auditor has a horrible feeling when there just doesn’t seem to be any boundary.
That is how the banking fiascos have felt over the last year or two. A minor inquiry from DoJ or some other regulator turns into full-blown investigation, then multiple regulators, and then six months or a year later most banks hand over a few billion collectively.
Then another investigation sprouts out of that one. And then there is half a dozen benchmark interest rates that have been manipulated.
Where is the fence showing the outer limits of fiascos created by the TBTF banks? I can’t see it.
Is there anything they aren’t playing games with?
There IS no fence showing the boundary or limit or end of fiascos
What’s next?
Possibly manipulating gold and silver prices?
…
Where is the fence showing the outer limit of banking fiascos?Read More »