March 2016

Surprise! Enforcement efforts against money laundering have unintended consequences.

Image courtesy of DollarPhotoClub.com.
Image courtesy of DollarPhotoClub.com.

Severe fines against large banks for violating anti-money laundering rules has led the banks to place a heavy focus on making sure their customers are legit. The result is a closing accounts of customers who have too high a risk of being shady. The unintended consequence is legitimate businesses and legitimate charities have difficulty finding a place to do their banking.

In a wonderful irony, articles at The Wall Street Journal on two successive days illustrate the tension. The articles leave you wondering in opposite directions. One article makes you think the banks ought to get serious about screening clients and shut down a bunch of accounts. The other article makes you wonder why these charities doing such wonderful work are getting all their accounts closed for no good reason.

First, charities finding themselves without bank accounts.

3/30 – Wall Street Journal – Cautious Banks Hinder Charity Financing / Account shutdowns and holdups of money transfers hinder ability to deliver aid to refugees – A charity that funds a school in Turkey which provides education to around 400 refugees from Syria had their account closed by JP Morgan for no stated reason. After an inquiry from the WSJ, the bank reversed their decision.

Another charity that operates a hospital in Syria had their accounts closed by BofA. After moving to Wells Fargo, their accounts were closed there. Staff at the hospital went four months without pay while the charity tried to figure how to get money into the country.

Authors have spoken to eight other charities who have had their accounts closed. Many others have had money transfers going into Syria, Turkey, or Lebanon held up for varying lengths of time.

Article mentions that banks are under pressure from the U.S. federal government to monitor their customers accounts and close those accounts which could be related to money laundering, whether related to drug running, terrorist financing, or other illegal activity.

Surprise! Enforcement efforts against money laundering have unintended consequences. Read More »

More good stuff for CPAs: fees increasing and level of change increasing

Image courtesy of DollarPhotoClub.com
Image courtesy of DollarPhotoClub.com

Two articles for your consideration:

  • We need to figure out how to ‘surf’ the massive waves of changes surrounding us.
  • Some CPAs are able to post fee increases. From my perception, that is a big change after seven years of economic hangover from the Great Recession.

3/24 – Tom Hood on LinkedIn – Why Accountants Must Learn How to Ride These Big Waves of Change – There are massive waves of change on the horizon. Risks of getting drowned are high for accountants and auditors.

We need to understand what those two comments mean and how to cope with the implications. Tom Hood’s article points toward those waves that are soon to crash down on our heads.

It’s a VUCA world

Major changes we are in can be summarized by that phrase: …

More good stuff for CPAs: fees increasing and level of change increasing Read More »

Good stuff for auditors: single audits, PCC alternatives, intangibles

Image courtesy of DollarPhotoClub.com
Image courtesy of DollarPhotoClub.com

Here are a few recent articles of interest to auditors:

  • Charles Hall discusses common deficiencies in government audits. Issues also apply to single audits for NPOs and all pension audits.
  • FASB removes the effective dates from PCC alternatives, which means they can be applied at any time by a private company without going through the preferability analysis.
  • FASB starts to think about whether to record expenditures for intangible assets on the balance sheet.

Single Audits

2/15 – Charles Hall at CPA-Scribo – Findings from Peer Reviews of Governmental Engagements – Three items to mention from this article.

First, the AICPA pulled in a selection of peer reviews performed on “must-select” engagements. The oversight was performed by highly experienced peer reviewers, meaning it is our calling CPAs who looked at the audit workpapers and peer review workpapers.

The results? Not good. Consider: …

Good stuff for auditors: single audits, PCC alternatives, intangibles Read More »

Where did the money go from all those mortgage settlements? Mostly the government.

Image courtesy of DollarPhotoClub.com
Image courtesy of DollarPhotoClub.com

Yes, the majority of the cash from those multi-billion dollar settlements was kept by the federal government.

The Wall Street Journal wonders Big Banks Paid $110 Billion in Mortgage-Related Fines. Where Did the Money Go?

Where did the money go from all those mortgage settlements? Mostly the government. Read More »

More good stuff for auditors – 3/9

 Image courtesy of DollarPhotoClub.com
Image courtesy of DollarPhotoClub.com

A few articles for CPAs:

  • Do group audit standards apply when there is only 1 auditor?
  • Pondering on how senior execs “go bad”
  • Link between gambling addiction and fraud
  • Steps by Big 4 to analyze ‘big data’ in audits

2/24 – Charles Hall at CPA-Scribo – Do the Group Audit Standards Apply When Only One Firm Audits Consolidated Financial Statements? – Short answer to the question: yes, they apply. Sorry if that is a shock to you.

More good stuff for auditors – 3/9 Read More »

More good stuff for auditors – 3/3/16

Image courtesy of DollarPhotoClub.com
Image courtesy of DollarPhotoClub.com

A few articles for CPAs.

  • A ‘virus’ that can infect your quality control system.
  • How to quickly check if someone is licensed.
  • Risks of working for the Big 4.
  • Deep background on the Private Company Council.

2/10 – CPA-Scribo – How Internal Viruses Affect Accounting Firms – No, not the kind of viruses you were thinking. This is caused by staff doing a quick search on the ‘net to find a sample note and pull down an erroneous example, which spreads to most financial statements issued over the next year.

Charles Hall provides a frighteningly real illustration how such a virus could hit a firm.

More good stuff for auditors – 3/3/16 Read More »

Another Olympus fiasco, with $640M penalty. No individual prosecutions.

Image courtesy of DollarPhotoClub.com
Image courtesy of DollarPhotoClub.com

The U.S. unit of Olympus admitted it made payments to doctors and hospitals as an inducement to buy Olympus equipment. The company agreed yesterday to pay $646M and enter into two deferred prosecution agreements in return for settling two criminal charges.

I don’t usually follow Foreign Corrupt Practices Act settlements, but this one caught my eye. I’ve not previously been aware of the Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits kickbacks from vendors to health care providers in the federal medical reimbursement marketplace. Olympus admits to violating both sets of laws.

Another Olympus fiasco, with $640M penalty. No individual prosecutions. Read More »